It’s hard to believe that just six years ago, BioProcess International published its first cell therapy supplement, which included just one article on “cell therapy bioprocessing” (1). At the time, most such processing was conducted in special clinical laboratories and academic institutions. As BPI continued to cover this relatively new segment of the biopharmaceutical industry, we heard more about “the product is the process” and “scale out instead of scaling up.”
After many trials, errors, and milestones, regenerative medicine has become a mainstream part of the biologics industry, supported by at least 670 companies and clinics of all sizes and 20 products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration so far (2). As the following article from Swapna Supekar shows, markets for all segments of regenerative medicine are growing quickly and projected to extend well into the next decade.
Increased industrialized processing launches new process choices and potential difficulties. Such issues used to be topics of yearly conference tracks and keynote addresses. But now they are enough to make up entirely separate meetings. The Biotech Week Boston (BWB) conference (held 4–7 October 2016) featured presentations devoted to innovations, tools, and commercialization issues of cell and gene therapies, a few of which are presented herein. Although this report is not comprehensive, each article represents one or more major issues cell, tissue, or gene therapies. Specifically, the authors address the industry’s need for fast scale-up for cell production, efficient purification of viral vectors for gene therapy, and further development in biofabrication (bioprinting). For the past six years, BPI has covered similar topics, so we encourage you to check our archives.
View the full article below – Login Required
Current Cell Processing Demands
Please log in to access this content.
1 Brandenberger R, et al. Cell Therapy Bioprocessing. BioProcess Int. 9(3) 2011: S30–S37.
2 Orchard-Webb D. Progress Toward Commercial Scale and Efficiency in Cell Therapy Bioprocessing. BioProcess Int. 14(9) 2016: S8–S11.
3 Reitze RL. Biotech Week Boston, Cell and Gene Therapy Bioprocessing and Commercialization: Boston, MA, 6 October 2016.
4 Olagunju P. Biotech Week Boston: Boston, MA, 6 October 2016.
5 Pettitt D, et al. Emerging Platform Bioprocesses for Viral Vectors and Gene Therapies. BioProcess Int. 14(4) 2016: S8–S17.
6 Symonds G. Cell-Delivered Gene Therapy: This Viral Vector Manufacturing Method Could Widen Its Applicability. BioProcess Int. 14(10) 2016: 18–21.
7 Terova O, et al. Innovative Downstream Purification Solutions for Viral Vectors: Enabling Platform Approaches to Advance Gene Therapies. BioProcess Int. 14(9) 2016: S20– S23.
8 Ausubel LJ, et al. Production of CGMP-Grade Lentiviral Vectors. BioProcess Int. 10(2) 2012: 32–43.
9 Ghieh F, et al. The Use of Stem Cells in Burn Wound Healing: A Review. BioMed Research Int. Article ID 684084, (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/684084.
Maribel Rios is managing editor of BioProcess International; firstname.lastname@example.org.