Full Text (PDF)
Public and private healthcare providers are under increasing pressure with the demand for better quality drugs and cheaper healthcare on the rise. However, rising costs and time scales for bringing new drugs to market suggest that challenging times are ahead for many pharmaceutical companies.
Current trends in US healthcare indicate that almost half of the hospitals across the country have seen a >20% drop in income. With an additional drop in financial donations, many hospital staff budgets are being cut, and some clinical development programs are getting postponed. Recent figures further support the need for change. Some 22% of chronically ill adults report serious problems with their treatments that can lead to issues of patient noncompliance. The increasingly aging population adds further pressure on pharmaceutical companies to deliver improved healthcare in new therapeutic areas. Although this demographic shift creates new markets, it also spurs new lower-cost competition.
These downward trends in the healthcare sector highlight the need for innovative solutions that provide less-expensive drugs and more effective treatments. In the worldwide pharmaceutical industry, only the market for biopharmaceuticals has seen double-digit growth. By 2006 this market was worth $76 billion, it almost doubled to $125 billion in 2008, and it is predicted to reach $203 billion by 2015 (1,2). However, a new biopharmaceutical typically takes eight to 12 years to bring to market at an average cost of $100–200 million. So the pharmaceutical industry must rethink efficiencies to reduce those costs and ensure quicker turnaround times to deliver more economical and efficient products.
The bioindustry's current requirement is to find ways to produce better quality products and maintain regulatory compliance while reducing overall costs and the time taken to bring new drugs to market. Biomanufacturing processes have seen major developments and improvements as a result. The introduction of innovative technologies and products is helping to drive efficiencies across the drug lifecycle.
New Technologies Address Old ChallengesMany biopharmaceutical organizations rely on mammalian cell-based expression systems as their production platform. Serum-free media are commonly used to culture those cells, often in conjunction with animal-derived supplements such as transferrin, albumin, or insulin-like growth factors to enhance growth and productivity. Animal-derived ingredients constitute an intrinsic safety risk, primarily through potential contamination of adventitious agents in the final drug product. Consequently, regulatory authorities enforce strict quality controls on all such products and their use in biopharmaceutical manufacture. Pharmaceutical companies are thus looking for alternatives.
Development of animal-free recombinant transferrin, albumin, or insulin-like growth factors is an example of how innovation has helped biopharmaceutical companies bypass some regulatory obstacles. These recombinant protein supplements are chemically defined and free from the risk of infecting patients, which alleviates many regulatory concerns traditionally linked with animal-derived protein supplements. Animal-free supplements have been developed specifically for use in large-scale mammalian cell culture and are now readily available.
The industry is also investigating the benefits of nonmammalian expression systems that offer additional benefits such as faster production timelines in simpler, chemically defined growth media. For example, certain microbes offer a rapid production process, can be cultured without animal- or human-derived materials, are versatile, and have broad product applicability. Because of the genetic simplicity of these organisms relative to animal cells, they can be genetically manipulated to optimize production of recombinant proteins without negatively affecting product quality. A number of systems and platforms — such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Picchia pastoris, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Corynebacterium glutamincum — offer solutions to some regulatory issues while reducing the timelines for bringing a new biotherapeutic to market or clinical trials.
Protein therapeutic developers face several other challenges, such as overcoming poor protein half-life and bioavailability. Such issues lower efficacy, which can cause high peaks or low levels of the drug in patients, potentially leading to unwanted side effects and limitations of the therapeutic benefit and requiring higher and more frequent doses. These are not only problems for patients, but they create additional strain on manufacturing capacities and ultimately incur higher treatment costs (Figure 1).
Facility Design Strategies for Single-Use Technologies
Please join us for a free webinar addressing strategies for facility design in biopharmaceutical manufacturing:
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
8:00 AM and 1:00 PM EST
Presented by:
Ingrid Long, MSc
Research Engineer
GE Healthcare Life Sciences
During the webinar, Ms. Long will discuss the impact of different strategies for facility design, with a focus on the following topics:
* Replacement of traditional equipment with the single-use equivalent
* Biopharmaceutical manufacturing in a single room
* Benefits of facility design with respect to cost, risk, and flexibility
Development of a Plant-Made Pharmaceutical Production Platform

